#BNP016* - ANOTHER TAKE ON TheBBC & TheBNP

#BNP016* - ANOTHER TAKE ON TheBBC & TheBNP

I do not believe that there is EVER a morally acceptable contingency where a vote for The BNP is acceptable.

A vote for The BNP may well be the lesser of two evils but I consider it a vote for evil on any occasion.
NEVER FORGET that The BNP has failed/refused to repudiate its association with White Supremacist Extremists and the murder of some 4-5,000 mostly young men BECAUSE they are coloured - including an elected Black Mayor January 2008 & a Mexican American 2009. Similarly they have failed to renounce their past association with extreme anti Judaism.

To VOTE BNP is to Vote for Evil.

Sunday, October 25, 2009
Nick Griffin and Question Time-The Last Word


It's all getting very tedious now, almost as tedious as the aftermath of that Paris car crash, or was it murder?


There seems to be a puke inducing holier-than-thou, self-righteousness fest as the politically correct try to outdo each other in their disgust at Griffin's appearance on Question Time.


All sense of proportion has been lost. Shirley Williams, David Owen and Bill Rodgers couldn't 'break the mould' so I would bet my life that the BNP are not about to take over from New Labour, next year or ever.


The only thing the politically correct misfits are doing is making themselves look very, very silly and dangerously obsessive. I have decided never to mention him, or his appearance on this blog again, please kick me if I do.


The Sunday Times today has the most balanced coverage, I can recommend it then suggest you move on. I particularly liked this AA Gill article: CLICK HERE.

To view the original blog CLICK HERE

Hi,

I can not but agree - but had it occurred their hatred may be as they lack confidence in their own values and see something of their own prejudice in the odious BNP.


I must warn you - You make the comment:

"Nick Griffin and Question Time-The Last Word"

I fear not - this is the holocaust he denied: CLICK HERE


I fear not - these are the cuddly Ku Klux Klan Griffin's friends: CLICK HERE


I fear not, as I can see this broadcast being on Meeeeja Studies Polytech Courses for ever more & like as not it will vie with The Gilbert Harding Interview as an exemplar of attrocious and incompetent TV for many years.

Know your enemy and destroy them with light and the oxygen of publicity.

Do not act like these vile people note that it was Bonnie Greer who most clearly destroyed Griffin with her hand of succour and her voice of reason which utterly evicerated Griffin.

Griffin is a practiced man of hate practiced as such as are Searchlight, UAF, ANL and their ilk - all are subject to destruction by quiet reason and patronising exposure they can not deal with.

The baying claque of the BBC merely gives fuel to the fire.

My Grandfather stood at The Somme, my Father relieved Belsen and I dealt with the violence and bodies in Africa - Silence The BNP and their fellow travellers with reason so that your children are not the next generation who remember the horrors of the bodies.

SORRY a bit serious but I can not see TheBNP, KKK, Searchlight, ANL, UAF, The EU, AWB as anything but different sides of an identical coin.

Regards,

Greg L-W.

#BNP015* - The BBC ALMOST Totally Betrays US - IT'S OWNERS!!

#BNP015* - The BBC ALMOST Totally Betrays US - IT'S OWNERS!

I do not believe that there is EVER a morally acceptable contingency where a vote for The BNP is acceptable.
A vote for The BNP may well be the lesser of two evils but I consider it a vote for evil on any occasion.
NEVER FORGET that The BNP has failed/refused to repudiate its association with White Supremacist Extremists and the murder of some 4-5,000 mostly young men BECAUSE they are coloured - including an elected Black Mayor January 2008 & a Mexican American 2009. Similarly they have failed to renounce their past association with extreme anti Judaism.
To VOTE BNP is to Vote for Evil.

Hi,

I have no doubt who were the winners and losers in the Broadcasting of The BBC's TV flagship political programme 'Question Time' and the involvement of Nick Griffin of The BNP.

Here are the winners and losers in order starting with the greatest losers:

01. 'e pluribus unum'
02. Pieter Hayne
03. Dimbleby
04. Jack Straw
05. The BBC
06. The claque
07. Chris Huhne
08. Said Warsi
09. Bonnie Greer
10. The BNP

01. 'e pluribus unum':
Clearly we are the losers - we now have as an example of attrocious TV on a parr with The Gilbert Harding interview.Just think, the BBC taxes us for their 'service'!

02. Pieter Haiyne:
Peter Hain's strident fascist self promoting determination to rehabilitate himself at the expense of The BBC showed him for what he is - a vile man without integrity, morality or common sense - so very Terre Blanche!


03. Dimbleby:
Even down to the gutter level of taunting Griffin for his nervous laughter. An obscene and crass performance on ALL levels very typical Dimbleby but more noticeable than normal - I doubt anyone was surprised!


04. Jack Straw:
Came across as a doddering eldely inadequate caught shop lifting - this is the man who abused his roll as Home Secretary to protect his brother from prosecution for the sexual abuse of his own son and assault of his daughter! This is also not just one of the communist members of Tony Blair's cabinet that approved the lies but also lied to Colin Powell & The UN to participate in the war crimes and murders in Iraq!
If The BBC gives air time to this revolting man, who has so betrayed Britain and abused his office, then clearly the largely irrelevant BNP could be justified each week!


05. The BBC:
The BBC spent days trying to talk up the controversy to create a fairly half baked demonstration; yet they still selected an audience clearly designed to act like a pack of playground bullies - a disgustingly orchestrated and utterly demeaning exhibition.

06. The claque:
Soooo predictable - you can ALWAYS line up a pack to behave badly - just look at football hooligans! How sad. These are the very basest instincts that are pandered to by any lynch mob EVEN The KKK!


07. Chris Huhne:
My word - to think he was so nearly leader of the LibDims. A sound but uninspiring collation of platitudes.


08. Sayid Warsi:
A good choice by the Tories - a good performance but clearly unaware that her look when not speaking matters.
Her political eviceration of Jack Straw was excellent I was sorry to see her run away from trying to defend Islam from Griffin's undeniable facts.
She WAS good relative to ALL others.
She WILL be excellent in time!


09. Bonnie Greer:
Bonnie Greer was a safe pair of hands - didn't put a foot wrong added humour and was without doubt THE most damaging to Griffin in the way that whilst all others were a baying mob she held out a hand of reason to Griffin and destroyed him with her academic and forensic discourse and patronising educational manner, used to such effect, to the naughty boy in the playground.
A masterfull use of her colour maturely used without the all too normal chip on the shoulder coloured racism.


10. The BNP:
The BNP were the winners as they will get the sympathy vote as a result of this shameful display, which showed Griffin to be shifty, intellectually challenged, untrustworthy & it is good to be reassured that his chum in The KKK may well have incited and attended the lynching but he didn't tie the knot!


I deeply regret that the crass management & shamefull handling by the BBC the utter inadequacy of Jack Straw, though I commend his attempt, the strident Hain granted the vile and shifty Griffin such a victory for The BNP.

8M viewers:
300,000 extra votes for The BNP
175,000 from Labour
50,000 from Lib.Dims.
50,000 from EUkip
25,000 from Tories.

"In politics, stupidity is not a handicap."
Napoleon Bonaparte (1769-1821),

Regards,
Greg L-W.

#BNP014* - TheBNP SEEKS SHELTER UNDER THE ACT!

#BNP014* - TheBNP SEEKS SHELTER UNDER THE ACT!
Hi,

I understand The BNP seeks to exempt itself from being bound by The Race Relations Act 1976 and subsequent ammendments from being considered racially descriminatory on the grounds of colour making a differentiation of ethnicity not being based upon colour per se under The Act.

AS I UNDERSTAND IT.

The BNP seeks to be absolved by the legitimate exploitation of Articles 25 & 26 which I print below for your assistance in reaching your own conclusion.

Personally I would opine that their contention is correct in a narrow interpretation of the letter of the law as enacted, but what is law if it is not a narrow interpretation of the letter of the law as it stands.

It must be considered reasonable if the law was set up to protect certain ethnic groups that for Justice to be seen to be done the letter of the law must protect all ethnicity.

The BNP must surely be seen to have a legitimate claim based upon their deffinition of ethnicity versus colour which I seem unable to fault.

The great advantage of having The BNP brought out into the open is that the spotlight of investigation, exposure and judgement can be enacted to ensure the validity of our laws.

At this stage neither The Government nor its underhand QUANGO The Race Relations Board which I have long considered to be of dubious legitimacy and morally unacceptable in its prejudicial and racist imposition of laws to engender hatred.

It is my belief and hope that the clear light of day shone on The BNP as a result of the aid and assistance given them by such as Nigel Farage & Mark Croucher and others in EUkip making such consistent efforts to raise their profile, such that they had 2 MEPs elected thanks largely to EUkip will in fact be The BNPs undoing.

IF fortuitously in the testing of the law we find that we are able to erradicate the institutionalised racism and promotion of descrimination by such odious QUANGOs as The Race Relations Board that is very much a double gain. Sadly we will have to tollerate the inept and indollent self seeking closet racism of EUkip which is so clearly breaking the surface not only by their assistance to The BNP but also by their overt association with the extreme racist Lega Nord in The EU toy parliament in return for The EU's 30 pieces of silver.

The man of no morality is easily bought and consistently EUkip has shown over the dozen years or so I have been a supporter of UKIP that the leadership of EUkip are so bereft as to be without a moral compass such that they can not find their way home and spend much of their time in self importance acting as useful idiots for The EU by providing them with a fig leaf of democracy in return for many a ladel of unaccounted gravy.

I understand a part of the bribe from The EU was to provide Farage with a chauffeur driven limo and rather more than a mere office but a suite of offices with an upgrade of depth to the pile of his carpets and a choice of leather furnishings! We are well aware of how little he did for his fortune last time beyond serve his own interests and accounts!

It is clear EUkip lacks a moral compass on any issue and are thus not only unable to find their way home but inadequate to lead anyone anywhere - least of all a Country to independence, liberty and restoration of the fundamentals of Justice in a sovereign status free of Political Correctness and its associated Common Purpose of Communism.

You can read the Race Relations Act 1976 in its entirety if you CLICK HERE

Alternately you can consider Articles 25 & 26 on which The BNP rests below:

Race Relations Act 1976
1976 c. 74

Warning: This content may not be up-to-date. Please check the Update Status Warning message at the top of the Results within Legislation page.
Version 1 of 1

Race Relations Act 1976 (c. 74) - Statute Law Database:

"An Act to make fresh provision with respect to discrimination on racial grounds and relations between people of different racial groups; and to make in the Sex Discrimination Act 1975 amendments for bringing provisions in that Act relating to its administration and enforcement into conformity with the corresponding provisions in this Act.

[22nd November 1976] Annotations:
Modifications etc. (not altering text)
C1Act: A reference to a detention centre within the meaning of Part VIII of the Immigration and Asylum Act 1999 (c. 33) to be construed as a reference to a removal centre within the meaning of that Part (10.2.2003) by virtue of Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 (c. 41), ss. 66(4), 162(2) (with s. 159); S.I. 2003/1, art. 2 , Sch.
C2Act modified by Employment Act 1989 (c. 38, SIF 43:1), s. 12(2)
Act: extended (2.5.2001) by 1996 c. 49, s. 8A(10) (as inserted (2.5.2001) by 1999 c. 33, s. 22; S.I. 2001/1394, art. 2, Sch.)
Act: applied (10.12.2001) by S.I. 1993/1813, art. 4(1C) (as inserted (10.12.2001) by S.I. 2001/3707, art. 4)
Commencement Information
I1Act not in force at Royal Assent see s. 79(2); Act wholly in force at 1.9.1977"

Race Relations Act 1976 (c. 74)
Main body
Part III Discrimination in other fields
Goods, facilities, services and premises

Race Relations Act 1976 (c. 74) - Statute Law Database:

"25.
Discrimination: associations not within s. 11.—

(1) This section applies to any association of persons (however described, whether corporate or unincorporate, and whether or not its activities are carried on for profit) if—

(a)it has twenty-five or more members; and

(b)admission to membership is regulated by its constitution and is so conducted that the members do not constitute a section of the public within the meaning of section 20(1); and

(c)it is not an organisation to which section 11 applies.

(2) It is unlawful for an association to which this section applies, in the case of a person who is not a member of the association, to discriminate against him—

(a)in the terms on which it is prepared to admit him to membership; or

(b)by refusing or deliberately omitting to accept his application for membership.

(3) It is unlawful for an association to which this section applies, in the case of a person who is a member or associate of the association, to discriminate against him—

(a)in the way it affords him access to any benefits, facilities or services, or by refusing or deliberately omitting to afford him access to them; or

(b)in the case of a member, by depriving him of membership, or varying the terms on which he is a member; or

(c)in the case of an associate, by depriving him of his rights as an associate, or varying those rights; or

(d)in either case, by subjecting him to any other detriment.

(4) For the purposes of this section—

(a)a person is a member of an association if he belongs to it by virtue of his admission to any sort of membership provided for by its constitution (and is not merely a person with certain rights under its constitution by virtue of his membership of some other association), and references to membership of an association shall be construed accordingly;

(b)a person is an associate of an association to which this section applies if, not being a member of it, he has under its constitution some or all of the rights enjoyed by members (or would have apart from any provision in its constitution authorising the refusal of those rights in particular cases).


26.

Exception from s. 25 for certain associations.—

(1) An association to which section 25 applies is within this subsection if the main object of the association is to enable the benefits of membership (whatever they may be) to be enjoyed by persons of a particular racial group defined otherwise than by reference to colour; and in determining whether that is the main object of an association regard shall be had to the essential character of the association and to all relevant circumstances including, in particular, the extent to which the affairs of the association are so conducted that the persons primarily enjoying the benefits of membership are of the racial group in question.

(2) In the case of an association within subsection (1), nothing in section 25 shall render unlawful any act not involving discrimination on the ground of colour."

To view the original of this data and the full Act CLICK HERE

I do not believe that there is EVER a morally acceptable contingency where a vote for The BNP is acceptable.

A vote for The BNP may well be the lesser of two evils but I consider it a vote for evil on any occasion.

NEVER FORGET that The BNP has failed/refused to repudiate its association with White Supremacist Extremists and the murder of some 4-5,000 mostly young men BECAUSE they are coloured - including an elected Black Mayor January 2008 & a Mexican American 2009.

Similarly they have failed to renounce their past association with extreme anti Judaism.

To VOTE BNP is to Vote for Evil.

#BNP013* - The BNP & VILE VIDEO EVIDENCE

#BNP013* - The BNP & VILE VIDEO EVIDENCE

Hi,

if you had any doubts as to how unpleasant and ignorant The BNP are I believe any intelligent individual will have seen through them fairly rapidly just by watching these videos they have in the public domain.

I have yet to see a video, even those made by The BNP or at least released by them that fails to show them as anything other than venal, vile and vituperative.

It is unfortunate that the spokesman for the Race Relations QUANGO is so similar in type to the various spokesmen the BNP tend to have, perhaps this was just mischief making on the part of Jon Snow as wasn't he a declared Communist when at Liverpool Uni. and may well still be one today for all I know - I watch neityher Jon Snow nor his Uncle Peter as both bring nothing to the subjects that interest me and their personal bias disinclines me to watch them - as with so much of the propaganda on TV!

Watch the videos for yourself and unlike the Fascist style organisations like Searchlight, UAF and their ilk it is not my intention to force my views on you but rather to provide you with the data on which you can establish your own views.

I find it hard to distingusish between the bullying abuseive style of UAF, The BNP and Searchlight - they have much in common. In fact I would contend there is more similarity between them than distance which may explain why their hatred of eachother is so redollent of sibling rivalry.

That organisations like EUkip and people like Farage, Croucher and their ilk did so much to raise the profile of The BNP that they managed to elect two MEPs comes as no surprise to the informed.

Unlike most I welcome the fact that the BNP are now dragged into the open and can be exposed for what they are in the light of day - the covert racism of EUkip is more subtle and infinitely more self serving and devious as can be seen by their allegiance with Lega Nord who make even todays vile BNP seem acceptable if you do not look too closely and hold your nose!











I do not believe that there is EVER a morally acceptable contingency where a vote for The BNP is acceptable.

A vote for The BNP may well be the lesser of two evils but I consider it a vote for evil on any occasion.

NEVER FORGET that The BNP has failed/refused to repudiate its association with White Supremacist Extremists and the murder of some 4-5,000 mostly young men BECAUSE they are coloured - including an elected Black Mayor January 2008 & a Mexican American 2009. Similarly they have failed to renounce their past association with extreme anti Judaism.

To VOTE BNP is to Vote for Evil.

#BNP012* - MIXED MARRIAGES - BNP OPINION

#BNP012* - MIXED MARRIAGES - BNP OPINION

Here is a brief consideration of a few instances that have benefitted from their mixed race origins.

Whether white who had black fathers such as



Lewis Hamilton

or


Barrack Hussein Obama

or



Paul Boateng

Then there are individuals such as the actor Keanu Reeves and supermodel Devon Aoki.

It is worth considering the achievement of the Swiss, negroid indiginous American mix of the Brazilian model Adriana Lima the third highest paid model on the planet!

Mixed race has done little harm to the actress Rosario Dawson who is of Puerto Rican, Afro-Cuban, Irish, and Native American heritage.

So that is politics, law, entertainment we must also include the huge number of mixed race achievements in sport or even men of stature in the military, consider General Colin Powell.

We haven't even considered the huge contributions to our society of the inter ethnic marriage of Semetic Jews and Caucasian gentiles.

This is what Nick Griffin has to say on mixed marriage (miscegenation) -

'''Nor even does it mean that we think that it is a good thing for even a single person of European stock to have so much as one child with a Japanese or Chinese. We do not, because such a union mixes what are not meant to be mixed, destroys two ancient family lines, and undermines two equally great but entirely separate cultures.

Much though many people would rather see a totally all-white Britain, this less than perfect arrangement and the fact that the United States of America is under the control of multi-racist fanatics who would bomb this country back into the Stone Age if we gave them the excuse by evicting the last non-whites at gunpoint.

However much we understand why miscegenation is fundamentally a bad thing, here are a hundred ways in which miscegenation could be discouraged – having TV soaps portray the problems it really can cause rather than presenting a fantasy picture of how wonderful it is supposed to be would be just one.

Best of all, however, would be an education system that teaches children of different races to have pride in their own people and to understand the essentially unnatural and destructive nature of miscegenation.

Do I regard a black or Asian, who loves Britain, as a suitable candidate to stand for the BNP at election time? No, I do not.

Do I regard someone who is married to or living with a partner of another race as a suitable member or candidate for the BNP? No, because by their choice they have clearly shown that they do not share our most fundamental values."

and

""... while the BNP is not racist, it must not become multi-racist either. Our fundamental determination to secure a future for white children is restated, and an area of uncertainty is addressed and a position which is both principled and politically realistic is firmly established.

We don't hate anyone, especially the mixed race children who are the most tragic victims of enforced multi-racism, but that does not mean that we accept miscegenation as moral or normal. We do not and we never will."

The very bland banality of his comments makes it all too clear who it is he sets out to dupe as followers of his particular line of bigotry. A challenged and threatened grouping who seek to blame the difficulties of their lives, not on the misfortune of their origins or inadequacy of their achievement but upon those they seek to portray as lesser than them who it seems all too readily do better than them!

Next one assumes the aim will be job reservation to protect the incompetent as there was in South Africa - so very unsuccessfully for then you have to ensure that education is controlled, not only to promote the farce but to provide streamed education to maintain it, next you have to move populations around to ensure demographic groups will provide the political will!! Some will recall the relocation of a large part of SARailways to Durban Point to ensure a Nationalist politician was elected as happened in many areas of South Africa where it was not the moving of borders, as practiced by Labour in Britain but the moving of populations that achieved the changes in voter numbers!

The obscene and insecure views of The BNP as expressed by Nick Griffin were not uncommon in America, particularly in the large rural states and those with migrant crop pickers, as is shown by the article from The Telegraph below. Fortunately by and large we have made progress with education.

I do not claim to advocate either ethnic mix of marriage nor for that matter marriages across the borders of superstition - there are enough difficulties in creating and maintaining long term relationships without the added external forces of different backgrounds, values, beliefs and superstitions.

The choice is that of the participants and no place for legal or social impositions. No more than it should be a force in our society to promote perversion though clearly should individuals wish to enter into a contractual relationship that again is no business of the state.

That Richard Nixon, whose morality in many areas is well known to be open to question, espoused the abortion of mixed race children is a sad reflection on the blinkered views of some in America at that time. It of course is founded on nonsense as what would be the exact shade of different race that must be violated by the state and have their chosen children killed?

It is questions like this that show just how risible is the view of those who are the white supremacists of America who are so closely interwoven in the roots of the BNP.

To this day the BNP has NEVER renounced its vile roots in association with the white supremacists of America nor the ritual killing for entertainment of 4-5,000 people, mostly young men just because they were black. The obscenity of racism and fear of other peoples' superstitions and origins has brought neither peace nor happiness, progress nor achievement to any society in all of history on this planet.

That The BNP has been promoted from festering in the back rooms of pubs, sordid little meetings of hate and the inadequacies of fear into the open light of day will of course be its undoing as it tries to justify its more vile aspects to the challenges of debate rather than the mantras of hate.

President Richard Nixon believed it was 'necessary' to abort mixed-race babies, newly released tapes have revealed.

By Toby Harnden in Washington
Published: 7:49PM BST 24 Jun 2009

President Richard Nixon said it was 'necessary' to abort mixed-race babies, tapes reveal Commenting privately on the landmark 1973 Supreme Court ruling Roe vs Wade, which decriminalised abortion in the US, the then-president said he worried that access to a legal abortion could lead to "permissiveness" because "it breaks the family" but thought them justified in certain cases.

"There are times when an abortion is necessary," he told his aide Chuck Colson. "I know that. When you have a black and a white." Mr Colson offered that rape might also make an abortion legitimate, prompting Mr Nixon to respond: "Or a rape."

The comments were revealed in more than 150 hours of tape and 30,000 pages of documents made public this week by the Nixon Presidential Library, part of the United State National Archives.

They were recorded by secret microphones in the Oval Office from January and February 1973 and provide fresh insights into Mr Nixon's tumultuous presidency, which ended with his resignation in August 1974 over the Watergate scandal.

Mr Nixon was widely believed at the time to be privately opposed to abortion rights, though he declined to take a public stance on the issue.

The tapes capture mundane conversations about daily life in the White House but also offer new insight into changes in US society.

During a telephone conversation with George H. W. Bush, then Republican National Committee chairman and later elected president in 1988, Mr Nixon said that a visit to the South Carolina legislature had persuaded him of the value of female political candidates for his party.

"I noticed a couple of very attractive women, both of them Republicans, in the legislature. I want you to be sure to emphasize to our people, God, let's look for some ... Understand, I don't do it because I'm for women, but I'm doing it because I think maybe a woman might win someplace where a man might not ... So have you got that in mind?" Mr Bush replied: "I'll certainly keep it in mind."

On the tapes, there are several examples of Mr Nixon's legendary paranoia about political enemies and his suspicion of Jews.

A 1969 memorandum reveals that members of the Kennedy family were tracked after the Chappaquiddick incident, in which Senator Ted Kennedy fled the scene of a car accident in which he female companion Mary Jo Kopechne drowned when he drove off a bridge.

Jack Caulfield, an assistant who carried out investigations of Nixon foes¸ reported that "our investigator" observed Robert Kennedy Jr going to see the car that his uncle had driven off the Chappaquiddick bridge two weeks earlier. A Kennedy family bodyguard, he added, might be a useful source of information.

During a February 1973 telephone conversation with the evangelist Billy Graham, Mr Nixon agreed with the evangelist that Jewish-American leaders who opposed efforts to spread Christianity were in danger of triggering an anti-Semitic backlash.

"What I really think is deep down in this country, there is a lot of anti-Semitism, and all this is going to do is stir it up.".

He added: "It may be they have a death wish. You know that's been the problem with our Jewish friends for centuries."

To view the original article CLICK HERE

I do not believe that there is EVER a morally acceptable contingency where a vote for The BNP is acceptable.

A vote for The BNP may well be the lesser of two evils but I consider it a vote for evil on any occasion.

NEVER FORGET that The BNP has failed/refused to repudiate its association with White Supremacist Extremists and the murder of some 4-5,000 mostly young men BECAUSE they are coloured - including an elected Black Mayor January 2008 & a Mexican American 2009.

Similarly they have failed to renounce their past association with extreme anti Judaism.

To VOTE BNP is to Vote for Evil.

#BNP011* - Nick GRIFFIN A PROFILE

#BNP011* - Nick GRIFFIN A PROFILE

June 14, 2009

Profile: Nick Griffin

The BNP leader has won an unprecedented electoral victory by masking his extremism with sharp suits and an amiable front
Nick Griffin’s wit may have helped him to become the most successful far-right leader Britain has ever produced. Among his drinking chums, the chairman of the British National party is apt to perform a hilarious party piece: he removes his glass eye and lays it on the table. It is curious behaviour that draws attention to a mysterious chapter in his shadowy past.

Last weekend the BNP secured its biggest mainstream victory when Griffin became its second member to be elected to the European parliament, as MEP for the North West region. Hours earlier, Andrew Brons, another candidate, won a seat in Yorkshire and Humber.

Griffin, convicted of inciting racial hatred in 1998, has called Britain “a multiracial hell-hole”, British Muslims “the most appalling, insufferable people to have to live with”, overt homosexuality “repulsive” and the Holocaust “the hoax of the 20th century”. Last week a pelting of eggs sent him scrambling for cover at his victory press conference.

By Griffin’s account, he lost his left eye in an accident when a discarded bullet exploded in a pile of wood he was burning at his home in 1990. Others have speculated that the accident happened during “survivalist manoeuvres” – a version lent some credence because his wife, Jackie, was not informed until a week later.

The timing is interesting: Griffin had just left the extremist National Front (NF) after an ideological spat and was living in France, where he had cashed in on the 1980s property boom after buying houses in Shropshire. Leading a disgruntled breakaway faction of the NF, he founded a new movement with one of the most notorious fascists in Europe.

Griffin’s collaborator, Roberto Fiore, was wanted by police in Italy after the 1980 bombing of Bologna railway station, which left 85 people dead and 200 wounded. Fiore, leader of the far-right organisation Terza Posizione, was sentenced to 10 years’ imprisonment in his absence and had spent much of the decade lying low in Britain. In 1986 he and Griffin set up a lucrative business, later renamed Easy London, helping young students and workers to find accommodation and work in London. The profits went to fascist groups.

The new political movement conceived by Griffin and Fiore had the arresting title of the International Third Position, with a racist agenda aimed at Jews, blacks and immigrants. Bizarrely, Griffin’s anti-Israel stance led him to make a fundraising trip to Libya at Colonel Muammar Gadaffi’s expense in 1988 (a few weeks before the Lockerbie bombing) and to laud Iran’s Ayatollah Khomeini, both of whom also shared Griffin’s antipathy to world capitalism, homosexuality and women’s rights.

Griffin’s professed sympathy with Islam’s values was at odds with his subsequent denunciation of the religion as “a wicked and vicious faith”, for which he was tried for inciting racial hatred in 2006 and found not guilty. His pragmatic U-turn allowed him to exploit public fears by claiming in the recent European election that Asian Muslims were sexually grooming white girls.

At any event, the loss of his eye changed his fortunes. The accident, he said, “knocked me out for a full year so I couldn’t finish the renovation work, interest rates went sky-high and I lost the whole lot”. He was declared bankrupt, owing £65,000, and dropped out of politics for a while.

These days he lives at an isolated stone farmhouse in the Welsh hills, about 10 miles from Welshpool. The two-acre property is guarded by security cameras, burglar alarms and two rottweilers named – with gloating insensitivity – Anne and Frank, after one of the most renowned Jewish victims of Nazi Germany.

Visiting members of the media, whom he amiably calls “lying scum”, tend to allow that Griffin is affable, funny and well read, as befits a Cambridge graduate. Only when fervour gets the better of him does spittle fleck his sharp suits and fashionable ties. His physical presence is unimpressive: of medium height, with a slight paunch accentuated by his bullet-proof jacket, he has dark brush-like hair and small, fleshy features.

According to his jovial wife, he has “never done a proper job” apart from renovating houses, chopping down trees and teaching foreign students English. “I’ve been the one who has actually gone out every day, working to keep us going financially,” said Jackie. “He’s spent his time playing at stupid politics. To Nick, it’s all a game.”

Jackie, a nurse who met Griffin while visiting her sister at Cambridge, may sometimes “hate the thought of being talked about as the wife of the BNP leader”, but by all accounts it is a happy marriage. She acts as Griffin’s assistant and a BNP administrator. They have four children, Jennifer, 23, Richard, 20, Rhiannon, 19, and Elen, 15, all Welsh speakers.

Griffin is now characterised as the most dangerous political figure since Sir Oswald Mosley led the British Union of Fascists. However, the BNP’s support was lower than at the previous European election and its victories this time are attributed in part to the collapse of the Labour vote. Griffin’s limited success has been to rebrand the party, muting its blatantly racist ideology – “Adolf went a bit too far” – and making the BNP “user-friendly” by tapping into the fears of the white working class about Islamic fundamentalism, immigration and jobs.

Griffin’s beliefs were instilled at an early age. His parents, Edwin and Jean, had met as Young Conservatives while heckling a Communist party meeting. Edwin, while serving in the RAF in India, had witnessed inter-racial violence during Partition, and returned home opposed to multiculturalism and immigration. He ran an electrical contracting business in Barnet, north London, where Griffin was born in 1959, but the business failed and the family moved to Suffolk.

Aged five, Griffin pedalled his tricycle up and down his street to campaign for Reginald Maudling, the Conservative candidate. After attending Woodbridge school in Suffolk, he won a sixth-form scholarship, becoming one of only two boys in the girls’ public school of Saint Felix, Southwold. According to Dominic Carman, his biographer, he was known as “Nick the Prick”, who told the school librarian: “I’m not an extremist; I’m a socialist – a national socialist.”

In 1974 Edwin, by now a Conservative councillor, was so dismayed by Britain’s leftward drift that he took his family to a National Front meeting in Norwich. Griffin, who had read Mein Kampf by the age of 13 and whose favourite game was “counting black people on the streets from the car window when my parents drove through London”, joined up soon afterwards.

The guest speaker that day was Martin Webster, the National Front’s activities organiser. Webster, who was openly gay despite the party’s homophobic stance, claimed Griffin turned up on his doorstep the following year and they began a two-year affair.

Griffin strongly denied the allegation, saying he couldn’t sue because no court would put any value on his reputation. “I did stay at his flat when I was 16, not knowing he was a poof,” he said. “I found out he was a poof because he tried it on, and I said, ‘No, thank you’.”

At Cambridge, where he studied history and law at Downing College, Griffin founded the Young National Front Students. A waiflike 8st loner, he was beaten up after an NF meeting and decided to learn to box. He became a boxing blue but graduated with a second-class degree, after which he spent a year on the dole. He began working for the NF, rising to its governing body and launching the magazine Nationalism Today.

After Griffin’s “accident” his parents saved him from financial ruin by selling their house. For a while he was a security man at the meetings of David Irving, the Holocaust-denying historian – “I looked quite good in a black leather jacket and an eye patch”. Griffin later reproached Irving for conceding that 4m Jews may have been killed by the Nazis.

In 1995 Griffin relaunched his political career when John Tyndall, an avowed Nazi who had founded the BNP in 1982, invited him to join the party. Griffin claimed he fell out with Tyndall over the latter’s policy on Muslims: “Because he hated Jews so much, he thought Muslims couldn’t be all that bad if they didn’t like Jews.” With majority support in the party, Griffin became BNP leader in 1999, ousting Tyndall in a bloodless coup.

He embarked on making the BNP electable, concealing his own extremism. He depicted party members as “politically incorrect rebels” rather than a bunch of skinheads; indeed, bomber jackets gave way to suits. The watchword was “normality”. He declared: “We are the first glimmer of resistance from the British people against being turned into a minority in our own homeland.”

In a moment of candour, he admitted that the BNP’s hope lay in public despair: “The worse the mess, then the more one rubs one’s hands with glee.” In another unguarded lapse, he told a journalist: “Basically, it’s race hatred, isn’t it?” He dreams of an old England, when “serfdom had given way to huge numbers of people owning their own plot of land and having access to the village commons”. If Griffin’s BNP has a future, it will always be looking back to the past.

To view the original article and many comments CLICK HERE

Interestingly it will be noted that Griffin has castigated this article as a pack of lies which he requests his supporters to complain about to The PCC - however it would seem he has identified none of the so called 'lies'.

The one point about The BNP's recent electoral achievement was the tremendous help received from EUkip and Farage & Croucher particularly, who could hardly manage two consecutive sentences without promoting awareness of TheBNP - organisations like Searchlight, UAF, Fabians, Common Purpose and other similar extremist pressure groups and parties have greatly helped TheBNP.

Most forms of fungus and corrosion thrive in darkness and the foetid secrecy of suppression - the death nell of TheBNP is in its present electoral achievement where as representatives of the people it MUST acquit its duty under the law since it now functions with public money performing a public function.

I find Griffin has identified these much vaunted 'lies' in a separate document:

On Sunday 14th June the Sunday Times printed an article headlined "Profile Nick Griffin", which contained the following inaccuracies:

1) First off, in the printed version of the Sunday Times article on page 23, in large bold letters below the title, it says "That Adolf...he went a bit too far" - and falsely attributed this sickening quote to BNP Chairman Nick Griffin! Mr. Griffin has never used such words. We should make clear that it appears that the article is largely based on Dominic Carman, whom the article claims is "Nick Griffin's biographer". Dominic was contacted by Nick with a view to doing a biography, but within several days it became clear that Dominic was not to be trusted and therefore was never Mr. Griffin's biographer on an official basis and no book was ever released with Mr. Griffin's endorsement.

2) The Sunday Times claimed that Jackie Griffin did not know of Nick's accident in which he lost his left eye until a week later. That is untrue, as it was just 2 days later through no fault of Mr. Griffins.

3) Nick did not lose his eye on any kind of "survivalist manoeuvres", it was a live shotgun cartridge which had been discarded in rubbish on a open fire from a house clearance.

4) The Sunday Times claimed that the Italian Roberto Fiore was wanted by police and convicted of a bombing. The Sunday Times had left out that Roberto was cleared of all of those charges and listed as a innocent victim in the whole affair by the Italian authorities.

5) The paper claims that Nick was some kind of business partner to Roberto Fiore. Nick has never setup or been partners on any business venture with Roberto Fiore.

6) It is claimed that Nick has named his two dogs "Anne" and "Frank". This is completely untrue and is sheer fantasy as his two dogs are called "Belle" and "Otto", names given to them by their previous owner.

7) Jackie Griffin, Nick's wife, has never said any of the following statements (in full, part or implied):
- He (Nick) "never done a proper job"
- "I've been the one who has gone out to work every day, working to keep us going financially"
- "He's spent his time playing at stupid politics, to Nick, it's all a game"
- "hate the thought of being talked about as the wife of the BNP leader"

8) Nick was never known as "Nick The Prick" at school. It's another Dominic Carman fantasy.

9) "Counting black people" from his parent's car was never a game that Nick played, yet another lie.

10) Nick was never beaten up at a National Front meeting though his father was - the Sunday Times couldn't even get the name of his father right; it's Edgar not Edwin.

11) The article claims that Nick was a security man for David Irving's meetings. He was for one meeting and that was it.

12) Nick did not "oust" John Tyndall in some kind of "bloodless coup" - he mounted a democratic leadership challenge and won.

13) The Sunday Times or one of their "sources" has even gone so far as to play word games, quoting Nick out of context with this gem: "In another unguarded lapse he told a journalist: 'Basically it's race hatred, isn't it?'" Of course, what they don't tell us is that Nick was talking about our opponent's views and ideology.


- we can can move on to the refusal of Griffin and TheBNP to either distance themselves from or denounce their roots in the vile and extremist White Supremacist movement of The USA - groups that institutionalised the ritual killing of some 4-5,000 individuals for entertainment and bonding of its members in their participation in the vile crimes based on race, colour and belief.

I do not believe that there is EVER a morally acceptable contingency where a vote for The BNP is acceptable.

A vote for The BNP may well be the lesser of two evils but I consider it a vote for evil on any occasion.

NEVER FORGET that The BNP has failed/refused to repudiate its association with White Supremacist Extremists and the murder of some 4-5,000 mostly young men BECAUSE they are coloured - including an elected Black Mayor January 2008 & a Mexican American 2009.

Similarly they have failed to renounce their past association with extreme anti Judaism.
To VOTE BNP is to Vote for Evil.

#BNP010* - Just A REMINDER

#BNP010* - Just A REMINDER

There is absolutely no justification for the racial hatred of The BNP and to this day they refuse to denounce their roots, origins and support within the White Supremacist Movement in America.

Organisations which gave and to some extent give The BNP support and succour, organisations which have ritualised, for entertainment, the gratuitous murder of some 4-5,000 people, mostly young men merely because they are black or coloured.

An obscene practice which in one form or another continues to this day.

These are the very people you can watch Nick Griffin speaking with in the following video clip.



If you need a further reminder:



There is absolutely no call for fascist extremism of any kind whether that of The BNP cleverly packaged and sold or the overt and vile behaviour of extremist groups like the criminally led pro EU Searchlight and The UAF.

The manner and practice of their lies and intimidation are from the same stable of warped and shamefull behaviour.

YOU may not have seen The Strange Fruit of the trees in Alabama, nor the bodies of the innocent at Sharpville, nor stood with the children facing the police in SOWETO in 1976.

There is no place for such violence in politics for as long as we have legitimate and meaningful access to The Ballot box - however increasingly that is a concept that is being whittled away by the increasing dominance of the undemocratic EU which now makes most of Britain's laws and dictates that all other law must be made EU compliant.

There is absolutely no excuse for mob violence or incitement to mob violence whether of extremist politics or the police CLICK HERE

Sadly I believe that the time for that is fast approaching from the EU dictator committee with its arrogant denial of democracy of its self serving elite - violence may become the only route to liberty as increasingly the ballot box proves useless, as politicians juggle with the methodology to ensure their control and act as displacement activity.

That The BNP, odious as they are, have used the ballot box to lawfully gain elected seats, hugely helped by EUkip, Farage, Croucher, Denny, McGough and their ilk shows that as yet there is no excuse for violence. Our democracy may well be greatly damaged by our association with undemocratic EU and our political class' betrayal but there is still some hope that must be nurtured.

A Patriot is someone who will resort to any method to defend his Country when DENIED the ballot box whereas a terrorist resorts to violence when he can not get his way through the ballot box - as with UAF, Searchlight & the like.

If the revolting extremist denial of democracy of The UAF, Searchlight is ever tolerated then we are in serious trouble as they are in their own way as vile, if not worse than The BNP for whom I hold no brief.

I do not believe that there is EVER a morally acceptable contingency where a vote for The BNP is acceptable.

A vote for The BNP may well be the lesser of two evils but I consider it a vote for evil on any occasion.

NEVER FORGET that The BNP has failed/refused to repudiate its association with White Supremacist Extremists and the murder of some 4-5,000 mostly young men BECAUSE they are coloured - including an elected Black Mayor January 2008 & a Mexican American 2009. Similarly they have failed to renounce their past association with extreme anti Judaism.
To VOTE BNP is to Vote for Evil.

#BNP008* - WE ALL HAVE A DUTY TO DEMOCRACY

#BNP008* - WE ALL HAVE A DUTY TO DEMOCRACY

Clean EUkip up NOW & make UKIP electable!

The corruption of some of EUkip’s leadership
& NEC is what gives the remaining 10%
a bad name!

WE ALL HAVE A DUTY TO DEMOCRACY THERE IS NO PLACE FOR THOSE WHO SEEK TO DESTROY IT!

Hi,

whatever one's political persuasions it is essential that we ALL uphold democracy and not emulate the yobs who aim to undermine democracy.

I am disgusted by pretend politicians who lack the wisdom, substance or conviction and feel they can not maturely address the vile beliefs of The BNP - there is no action in a democracy more revolting than refusing to engage with the views of an elected representative - I can understand those who feel their opinions are too close to the views of The BNP or can make no clear argument fearing they will be exposed by association in debate on a public platform.

There is absolutely no excuse for gutter politics - least of all by elected politicians who run away - that way grants the vile BNP yet another victory.

I listened to The PM programme on BBC Radio 4, on which a representative of the scum who took it upon themselves to engage in abuse of d3emocracy by attacking the elected BNP leader. Democracy shows Ms. Kavanagh and those with her are at fault not Griffin of The BNP however odious his beliefs and policies.

Griffin's election shames only the 2% who voted for him Ms. Kavanagh, The anti Fascis mob, Searchlight, the police and their ilk shame us all by their overt or covert attack on democracy that we did NOTHING to prevent.

I have posted the following comments on The PM Blog at The BBC:

#308
Hi,

strenuously and actively as I have denounced and exposed the vile aspects of The BNP & its revolting antecedence in Racism & anti Judaism and their refusal to denounce their roots and associations with the vile American White Supremacist organisation who have, for entertainment, ritually killed, mostly by lynching, some 4-5,000, mostly young men, just because they are black or coloured.

The BNP are both vile & duplicitous, but at least they SEEK to practice their evil craft by democratic means.

Such extremist organisations as Searchlight give greater credence to The BNP as Searchlight with its dishonest supporters and corrupt practices do as much damage to our democracy as the baying yobs of so called anti fascist leagues.

It is infact The Conservatives, The Labour Party, LibDims, Unions, Fabians, Common Purpose and their fellow travellers of The New World Order who are destroying our democracy and refusing to represent either the wishes or the best interests of these United Kingdoms and our peoples and NOT The BNP I am ashamed to say.

I welcome the fact that the BNP now has elected representatives as it gives the decent peoples of Britain the opportunity to debate with them and expose just how vile they are - they have grown in the atmosphere of half truths that such as Searchlight has kept them in - they have grown and seeded just like dry rot in an old building, exploiting every patch of opportunity.

People should not be so imature and scared as to run away from The BNP or rely on gutter tactics of egging and chanting - stand your ground calmly and rationally and expose the BNP for what it is.

Let us face it Nigel Farage and EUkip have much to answer for in acting as recruiting sargeants for The BNP by making foolish claims of infiltration and mentioning The BNP in every sentence, seemingly to desparately distance the racists in their midsts from The BNP - or so it seems.

The way to lead is not by lies and mantras but by confronting the enemy calmly, rationally and politely with facts, figures and the truth.

Would that EUkip, Searchlight and their fellow travellers would learn this lesson rather than inculcate panic.

Do not forget that The BNP in an electorate of over 40 Million was able only to gain 2% support and also note the harm hysteria, bullying and lies did EUkip who in the face of a Labour melt down only managed to increase their vote by 0.3%.

There is a place for the BNP in British politics as they provide the perfect opportunity to expose Racism, Nationalism, anti Judaism, anti Islamism and the other vile concepts they so clearly espouse and a chance to show the values of hospitality, integration, shelter, tollerance and Patriotism.

Democracy will win, as long as we can prevent its destruction by The EU and their supporters in The Lib.Lab.Con and odious organisations like Searchlight, The Fabians & Common Purpose who seek tocentralise and control in a society where democracy is denied - we saw a small example of that today on College Green.

Regards,
Greg L-W.

&

#401
Hi,

Mr. Griffin speaks for a tiny percentage of the enfranchised voters of these United Kingdoms - those who by due process in the democratic process elected him - you may believe that misguided or ill informed, but the oxygen of publicity will soon corrode the support as people realise just what around 2% of our peoples voted for.

Nothing will do greater harm to the BNP than having elected representatives, and the duties that makes them liable for - duties which make them open to many more laws against discrimination than they were exposed to as a private self funded organisation - now they must account for public money and public duties.

Ms. Kavanagh represents NO ONE in the democratic process, she has not a vote to support her - merely the baying claque that has done such damage to democracy in its strident abuse of the freedoms given to her BY democracy.

As yet we have not adopted the Continental policy of water cannons, nor openly armed police shooting protesters, but considering Mr. Brown's corrupt Political Police Enforcers were happy to beat up peaceful protesters at The G20 Summit, have a shoot to kill policy of murdering suspects, viz. Menenez & 30 others ( CLICK HERE ) and arrest women for reading out a list of victims of The Government policy of war crimes in Iraq - where were the police today?

Where were the Police, who should have upheld democracy and arrested the chanting violent scum with Ms. Kavanagh. People like the extremist Searchlight who work to undermine democracy by lies and intimidation.

The message of The BNP revolts me, but so also do those who seek to destroy democracy like The Anti Fascist league, Searchlight & the Ms. Kavanaghs - the BNP trash are no risk but they deffinitely are, as it is they who seek to dictate policy and destroy democracy.

Just as EUkip will cheat and lie to silence their critics and those who seek probity and transparency in politics which threatens their route to the troughs on the gravy train.

Regards,
Greg L-W.

Perhaps you would care to add your comment on The BBC PM Blog.

Fair play to the interviewer who had the misfortune of interviewing Ms. Kavanagh, he made it very clear her action tas wrong, damaging and anti democratic. May I for once clearly state my praise for the interviewer - far better than the vile attack on democracy by Ms. Kavanagh and her odious associates; far better than the Police who totally failed in their duty to uphold democracy and protect our elected representatives and FAR better than the biased and unprofesional interview of The BNP's elected representative by John Humphries on the Toady programme on Monday.

I do not believe that there is EVER a morally acceptable contingency where a vote for The BNP is acceptable.

A vote for The BNP may well be the lesser of two evils but I consider it a vote for evil on any occasion.

NEVER FORGET that The BNP has failed/refused to repudiate its association with White Supremacist Extremists and the murder of some 4-5,000 mostly young men BECAUSE they are coloured - including an elected Black Mayor January 2008 & a Mexican American 2009. Similarly they have failed to renounce their past association with extreme anti Judaism.

To VOTE BNP is to Vote for Evil.

TO LEAVE THE EU

What is the exit and survival plan for these United Kingdoms to maximise on the many benefits of leaving The EU. It is the DUTY of our Politicians and Snivil Cervants to ensure the continuity, liberty and right to self determination of our peoples they have a DUTY to protect against crime and secure both our food and our border.
NONE of these DUTIES has a single British politician upheld for 40 years. They have drawn their incomes fraudulently and dishonesty.

Politicians are failing to tell the truth, but so are almost all wanabe Politicians, the MSM and Snivil Cervants.

The fact is that even if EVERY British MEP wanted change in The EU it would achieve NOTHING.
Every single British Politician, of EVERY Party, elected since before we joined the EUropean Common Market, has promised to change The EU's CAP - In 40 Years they have achieved absolutely NOTHING!

To try to put a value on OUR Freedom is as futile as floccipaucinihilipilification and as odious as the metissage of our societies, as we rummage in the ashes of our ancestors dreams, sacrifices and achievements, the flotsam of our hopes and the jetsam of our lives, consider the Country and Anglosphere which we leave our children and the future, with shame!

Regards,
Greg L-W.
01291 – 62 65 62

PLEASE POST THIS TAG AS FOLLOWS:ON YOUR eMAILS & BLOGS, FORUM POSTINGS & MAILINGS - GET THE MESSAGE TO THE PEOPLE IT IS OUR BEST HOPE AS WHOEVER IS APPOINTED WILL MAKE NO DIFFERENCE AS PROVED!

I SUGGEST – since there is clearly no political party of repute, advocating or campaigning for withdrawal of these United Kingdoms from the EU and restoration of our independent sovereign, democracy, with Justice & the right to self determination in a free country. Deny the self seeking & meaningless wanabe MEPs the Mythical Mandate for which they clamour. Diktat is imposed from The EU but Law should be made at Westminster, for our Country & our Peoples.

Write Upon Your Ballot Paper:

LEAVE THE EU

#BNP007* - THINK WHAT UKIP MIGHT HAVE ACHIEVED

#BNP007* -

THINK WHAT
UKIP MIGHT
HAVE ACHIEVED


Hi,

I can not for a moment seriously fault what The BNP is stating but may I remind you that The BNP is not only founded on but has refused to renounce its roots in The Extremist White Supremacy Movement of America and thus its endorsement of the ritual murder of between 4 & 5,000, mostly young men – PURELY based upon their skin colour – Ritual Murder, mostly by lynching, carried out for entertainment.

I derive the same shame for my Country that The BNP has gained sufficient support that some consider they represent Britain.

May I remind you that The BNP policy of denial of the holocaust is an accepted fact thus effectively endorsing the murder of 10s, 100s, 1,000s in fact Millions of people just because of their religion – It is not that they like me question the glib assertion of 6,000,000 Jews slaughtered but that Millions were killed is irrefutable, whether 1 Million or 10 Million is not an issue The BNP claim the holocaust did NOT occur and that ‘Arbeit Macht Frei’ was merely a labour scheme where workers died of typhus and the like.

The BNP is an excrescence and represents absolutely no value which I have EVER understood to be either British or worthy of defence let alone protection.

The BNP and their ‘balancing’ organisations – extremists and self seekers like Searchlight or even Common Purpose and The Fabians have much in common in the dishonesty of their underhand methods, bullying and intimidation.

Sadly as so often in politics the laws of unintended consequences are of great significance – after 5 years of betrayal by EUkip as its MEPs engorged themselves and their bank accounts, defrauded and betrayed Britain and the elect orate and did much to aid and support our enslavement in The EU as ‘useful idiots’. Yet although the public were increasingly aware of the damage done to our Country EUkip has found favour with The media not on the basis of their likely achievement of 0 to 3 or 4 MEPs but both as a protest vote over Westminster allowances and venality but even more as a block to The BNP.

Even so EUkip can not claim any achievement with a gain of merely 0.30% even if they tried to claim they were something other than an acceptable protest vote of no merit in their own right - do not forget they suddenly woke up on Thursday and both to try to keep in view and also to prepare their excuses for their abject failure with only 0 to 3 or 4 MEPs elected themselves they launched themselves as The Origami Party making utter fools of themselves claiming their voters were too stupid to unfold the ballot paper! I wonder howmany votes UKFirst Party would have done had their ballots not been folded - perhaps they would have taken even more votes from EUkip of those who value leaving the EU but are sick of the behaviour of EUkip.

Having massively and deliberately raised the profile of The BNP Farage and his venal Faragista Fan Club; which has dragged UKIP into the gutter, surrounding himself with paid praise singers and some of the most vile people in Politics today in Britain, involvement with liars and cheats to gain victory is no achievement – to call in as support for such a failure of ability such as Croucher and his vile extremist friends in the pro EU Searchlight is NO achievem,ent.

EUkip has acted as the greatest recruitment sergeant in their history ensuring, with Farage’s self serving fantasies and personal greed, that The BNP was centre stage in any political discussion particularly since his faux ‘Reichstag Fire’ moment and the obscenity of the NEC Faragista Fan Club ‘Crystal Nacht’ of witch hunts, bullying, smearing and vile attacks on elected members and dedicated Patriots.

Shame on EUkip it is hard to tell which is the more vile!

To understand British values with some gravitas – not just a ‘cheeky chappie’ with the morals of an alley cat and the leadership skills of a barrow boy – may I suggest that you not only watch this video on You Tube


Or for a different example:
CLICK HERE

Then consider ‘British values and if you like many were duped into making a protest vote that had a further 10 clearly incompetent, corrupt and dishonest EUkip MEPs elected or if you went that one step further and based on the publicity Farage and his chums gave The BNP you may have even voted for them in your ignorance.

Thursday 4th. June 2009 was almost as great a catastrphy as was the day when our Politicians first betrayed us in entering into The EU or as it was then – an Act which was not only contra The British Constitution but was also unlawful and thus illegal under British Law.

Perhaps, without Civil Unrest, we are beyond the point of no return BUT I caution that Civil Unrest is an inevitable consequence of membership of The EU.

There is every possibility that The EU in its demise WILL give rise to some 200,000,000 deaths in the wars of disassociation – be minded Britain and The EU are net importers of food – we make NOTHING which we can, without the most staggering of ‘deals’ export as The EU & Britain make NOTHING which the rest of the world wants or needs at a price it is willing to pay.

Just howmuch is a BMW, VW, Merc., Ford Focus? A Tatta will market new in Britain next year for about £1,200 – Do YOU believe the world will buy ONE of our cars when they can buy almost 10 Tattas for the price of our cheapest!

Now price our Civil Planes (did the Airbus ice up due to a design fault?) – Then there is Galileo a satellite surveillance system the encoding of which was broken by kids at College in the USA with parts bought from Tandy – or perhaps the utterly useless Euro Fighter neither fighter or bomber with a dud HUD and poor cornering and speeds that outstrip its radar – for the money a heap of junk relative to the F series US planes available with maintenance and parts off the shelf at a fraction of the costs, the same is true of the idiot boys toys, Choppers our Generals want where they cost so much you wouldn’t risk using them in battle!! How very useful – an overpriced ornament?

No - The 4th. June 2009 was a sad day for Britain.

Do Please Circulate this IT MATTERS.

Regards,
Greg L-W.

For Full Contact Details & Other Blogs etc. CLICK HERE

To see The Election Results in Comparison: CLICK HERE


I do not believe that there is EVER a morally acceptable contingency where a vote for The BNP is acceptable.

A vote for The BNP may well be the lesser of two evils but I consider it a vote for evil on any occasion.

NEVER FORGET that The BNP has failed/refused to repudiate its association with White Supremacist Extremists and the murder of some 4-5,000 mostly young men BECAUSE they are coloured - including an elected Black Mayor January 2008 & a Mexican American 2009. Similarly they have failed to renounce their past association with extreme anti Judaism.

To VOTE BNP is to Vote for Evil.

#BNP005* - TheBNP IS VERY UN BRITISH

#BNP005* - TheBNP IS VERY UN BRITISH

For more info on The BNP you may find Tim Montgomerie's site of interest at CLICK HERE

I do not believe that there is EVER a morally acceptable contingency where a vote for The BNP is acceptable.
A vote for The BNP may well be the lesser of two evils but I consider it a vote for evil on any occasion.
NEVER FORGET that The BNP has failed/refused to repudiate its association with White Supremacist Extremists and the murder of some 4-5,000 mostly young men BECAUSE they are coloured - including an elected Black Mayor January 2008 & a Mexican American 2009.
Similarly they have failed to renounce their past association with extreme anti Judaism.
To VOTE BNP is to Vote for Evil.

#BNP004 - THE BNP IS ONLY THE LESSER OF 2 EVILS

#BNP004 - THE BNP IS ONLY THE LESSER OF 2 EVILS

Clean The BNP up NOW & RENOUNCE Racism, anti-Semitism & The ROOTS of The BNP to one day make The BNP ELECTABLE BY PEOPLE of PRINCIPLE & MORALITY!

The corruption of some of The BNP & leadership
is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!

To Vote BNP is not a Protest Vote it is a statement that you are unethical!

It is morally wrong to vote for the lesser of two Evils as you are then giving your support and mandate to Evil.


TO LEAVE THE EU

What is the exit and survival plan for these United Kingdoms to maximise on the many benefits of leaving The EU. It is the DUTY of our Politicians and Snivil Cervants to ensure the continuity, liberty and right to self determination of our peoples they have a DUTY to protect against crime and secure both our food and our border.
NONE of these DUTIES has a single British politician upheld for 40 years. They have drawn their incomes fraudulently and dishonesty.

Politicians are failing to tell the truth, but so are almost all wanabe Politicians, the MSM and Snivil Cervants.

The fact is that even if EVERY British MEP wanted change in The EU it would achieve NOTHING.
Every single British Politician, of EVERY Party, elected since before we joined the EUropean Common Market, has promised to change The EU's CAP - In 40 Years they have achieved absolutely NOTHING!

To try to put a value on OUR Freedom is as futile as floccipaucinihilipilification and as odious as the metissage of our societies, as we rummage in the ashes of our ancestors dreams, sacrifices and achievements, the flotsam of our hopes and the jetsam of our lives, consider the Country and Anglosphere which we leave our children and the future, with shame!

Regards,
Greg L-W.
01291 – 62 65 62

PLEASE POST THIS TAG AS FOLLOWS:ON YOUR eMAILS & BLOGS, FORUM POSTINGS & MAILINGS - GET THE MESSAGE TO THE PEOPLE IT IS OUR BEST HOPE AS WHOEVER IS APPOINTED WILL MAKE NO DIFFERENCE AS PROVED!

I SUGGEST – since there is clearly no political party of repute, advocating or campaigning for withdrawal of these United Kingdoms from the EU and restoration of our independent sovereign, democracy, with Justice & the right to self determination in a free country. Deny the self seeking & meaningless wanabe MEPs the Mythical Mandate for which they clamour. Diktat is imposed from The EU but Law should be made at Westminster, for our Country & our Peoples.

Write Upon Your Ballot Paper:

LEAVE THE EU

I do not believe that there is EVER a morally acceptable contingency where a vote for The BNP is acceptable.

A vote for The BNP may well be the lesser of two evils but I consider it a vote for evil on any occasion.

NEVER FORGET that The BNP has failed/refused to repudiate its association with White Supremacist Extremists and the murder of some 4-5,000 mostly young men BECAUSE they are coloured - including an elected Black Mayor January 2008 & a Mexican American 2009. Similarly they have failed to renounce their past association with extreme anti Judaism.
To VOTE BNP is to Vote for Evil.

#BNP003* - BEWARE OF STANDING ON THE SHOULDERS OF GIANTS

#BNP003* - BEWARE OF STANDING ON THE SHOULDERS OF GIANTS

Clean The BNP up NOW & RENOUNCE Racism, anti-Semitism & The ROOTS of The BNP to one day make The BNP ELECTABLE BY PEOPLE of PRINCIPLE & MORALITY!

The corruption of some of The BNP & leadership
is what gives the remaining 10%
a bad name!

BEWARE OF STANDING ON THE SHOULDERS OF GIANTS FOR THEY HOLD A MAGNIFYING GLASS TO YOU FOR COMPARISSON!

Hi,

It is interesting that EUkip are following the very clear lead of trying to piggy back on the Shoulders of Giants with the implication that great figures from our history just migh promote and endorse the behaviour of The odious BNP be it Churchill, or Dowdings brylcream boys - My Father was a decorated Fighter Pilot with an exemplary war fought in Spitfires and it has been my privilege to have met several of the WWII Battle of Britain pilots and also a number of individuals who have earned VCs, DSOs, DFCs, AFCs, MCs etc.

I currently live in the town where many of Archie McKindo's Guineapigs were treated, in the building where the last Pathfinder death of the war was born.I also had the privilege of education at the school which produced both Field Marshalls Haig and Birdwood and served in the army including Sandhurst.

I do not believe that a single solitary leader or highly decorated War time combatant would be other than revolted by The BNP and their refusal to denounce their roots or their funding by the White Supremacist Movement in America that will not denounce the ritual killing of some 4-5,000 young men because they were black or coloured!

Further I do not believe any of those great men or the women of equivalent stature would endorse the determination of The Faragista Fan Club to drag the party back into history with centralised authoritarian etreme right wing policies and the palpable exploitation of Black, Asian and Coloured members (Tokenism).


It is dangerous to align with individuals from history as you will note the EUropean Movement, Lib.Dims. and many EUrophiles habitually quote Winston Churchill out of context to mislead the less well read and poorly educated.

I feel Churchill's attitude to such deceit would have been VERY clear:

Mindwed that Winston Spencer Churchill was born in 1874 and died in 1965 you will not be surprised that as an Anglo American he held a diversity of views over some 80+ years in the public eye.

You will note one of his early books when serving our Country and putting his life at risk in a dispute/war that goes on to this day and cost China Gordon both his career and his life, the Government papers of the time are still under an extended 100 year embargo!)

Having returned to Britain the young Winston wrote of his experiences and in 1899 the first edition of 'The River Wars' was published.

Reprehensibly the revolting Nick Griffin of The BNP saw fit to publish in an open 'e'Mail to me in one of my vigerous arguments to expose The BNP and its revolting base and total misrepresentations of truth by clever misrepresentation by including half truth in much the way that Hitler, the NSDAP, Searchlight, Mark Croucher, The EUrophiles, and others seeking to sell lies and dishonest scams, policies and products.

Amusingly the copy of the text the odious Griffin used would seem to have been copied from a version I loaded to the internet from my First Edition of this magnificent account when seen in the context of time.

That I so comprehensively and publicly trashed the lies of Griffin led first to him trying to claim that he could not be held responsible just as the Tories had promoted slavery! Clearly he had not realised whom William Wilberforce had supported nor which party had ordered The Royal Navy to seize The Blackbirds and free the cargo. Nor it seems had he much knowledge of the slavers of Barbary and the origins of Morris Dancing and its connections with Barbary slavers in Cornwall & South Wales.

Griffin quit and ran from the 'e'Mail drubbing and I am given to understand he admonished his senior members to avoid engagement with me!

The danger of misleading quotes based on false or dishonest interpretation is clear:
"How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. The effects are apparent in many countries.

Improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live. A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement; the next of its dignity and sanctity.

The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property, either as a child, a wife, or a concubine, must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men. Individual Moslems may show splendid qualities. Thousands become the brave and loyal soldiers of the Queen; all know how to die; but the influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it.

No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing faith. It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising fearless warriors at every step; and were it not that Christianity is sheltered in the strong arms of science‹the science against which it had vainly struggled‹the civilisation of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilisation of ancient Rome."

Of being fundamentally dishonest and seeking to mislead here are some other heros of our Nation who would have undeniably rejected The BNP and its sordid roots which it refuses to denounce - or for that matter the BNP style behaviour of The Faragista Fan Club.

A dozen years ago I openly stated that Farage was the greatest assett UKIP had but that he ever became leader he waould destroy UKIP as he is too weak, too self indulgent, too light weight and lacks the qualities of leadership or any discernible Officer Qualities - an excellent interviewee, sound bite preasenter and presenter of about 4 speeches.

That does not for one moment constitute a leader and results in sychophants and praise singers who will do anything to perpetuate their own position.

If EUkip and The BNP wish to perpetuate their piggy backing dishonestly on the shoulders of giants here are a few more Great Heros who would have totally rejected them and their practices, they were men of honour and courage. To pretend to the support of the great and stand on the shoulders of giants grants people the absolute right to compare:





TO LEAVE THE EU

What is the exit and survival plan for these United Kingdoms to maximise on the many benefits of leaving The EU. It is the DUTY of our Politicians and Snivil Cervants to ensure the continuity, liberty and right to self determination of our peoples they have a DUTY to protect against crime and secure both our food and our border.
NONE of these DUTIES has a single British politician upheld for 40 years. They have drawn their incomes fraudulently and dishonesty.

Politicians are failing to tell the truth, but so are almost all wanabe Politicians, the MSM and Snivil Cervants.

The fact is that even if EVERY British MEP wanted change in The EU it would achieve NOTHING.
Every single British Politician, of EVERY Party, elected since before we joined the EUropean Common Market, has promised to change The EU's CAP - In 40 Years they have achieved absolutely NOTHING!

To try to put a value on OUR Freedom is as futile as floccipaucinihilipilification and as odious as the metissage of our societies, as we rummage in the ashes of our ancestors dreams, sacrifices and achievements, the flotsam of our hopes and the jetsam of our lives, consider the Country and Anglosphere which we leave our children and the future, with shame!

Regards,
Greg L-W.
01291 – 62 65 62

PLEASE POST THIS TAG AS FOLLOWS:ON YOUR eMAILS & BLOGS, FORUM POSTINGS & MAILINGS - GET THE MESSAGE TO THE PEOPLE IT IS OUR BEST HOPE AS WHOEVER IS APPOINTED WILL MAKE NO DIFFERENCE AS PROVED!

I SUGGEST – since there is clearly no political party of repute, advocating or campaigning for withdrawal of these United Kingdoms from the EU and restoration of our independent sovereign, democracy, with Justice & the right to self determination in a free country. Deny the self seeking & meaningless wanabe MEPs the Mythical Mandate for which they clamour. Diktat is imposed from The EU but Law should be made at Westminster, for our Country & our Peoples.

Write Upon Your Ballot Paper:

LEAVE THE EU

I do not believe that there is EVER a morally acceptable contingency where a vote for The BNP is acceptable.

A vote for The BNP may well be the lesser of two evils but I consider it a vote for evil on any occasion.

NEVER FORGET that The BNP has failed/refused to repudiate its association with White Supremacist Extremists and the murder of some 4-5,000 mostly young men BECAUSE they are coloured - including an elected Black Mayor January 2008 & a Mexican American 2009. Similarly they have failed to renounce their past association with extreme anti Judaism.
To VOTE BNP is to Vote for Evil.