I wonder if someone could explain in simple language to the BNP that this post made on their official support site 'Green Arrow' serves them ill and shows them yet again for the duplicitous and underhand people they are.
Ot is well known that I have little but contempt for UKIP under its present proven corrupt leadership and the hige diservice done to the genuine opponents of EIropean Union membership done by both wings of racism be that the BNP or UKIP under its present leadership team with its present fellow travellers in the BNP.
However this posting:
Asylum seekers campaigning for UKIP!
UKIP’s “Anti-Islamification” and “Anti-Immigration” Posturing Exposed as Hoax
The fake UKIP party’s posturing as an anti-Islamification and anti-immigration party has been exposed as a hoax with the news that two out of the five-man strong party election team in Wrexham appear to be Muslim Somali ‘asylum seekers’ who arrived in Britain about four months ago.~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Truely dishonest as where is there a statement regarding "Anti-Islamification" in UKIP official literature and where do they state they are "Anti-Immigration"?
I believe you will find NO WHERE.
I am happy to concede that being a party with many elderly members and supporters they have made political capital out of the move to whip up publicity based on a fear of women wearing Burqas! A particularly distasteful and ill considered piece of Zionist inspired racist stupidity, in my opinion.
The fake UKIP party’s posturingI don't think you will find that UKIP is fake - though many of its claims and deceits may well be!
as an anti-Islamification and anti-immigration party has been exposed as a hoaxI believe this is BNP spin as I know of no approved UKIP literature that gives credence to this BNP claim!
with the news that two out of the five-man strong party election team in Wrexham appear to be Muslim Somali ‘asylum seekers’Would that be the two at the right or the two at the left? In passing how are you able to identify their nationality from a photo, since you have led no clear evidence?
who arrived in Britain about four months ago.It would seem that The BNP have much insight into these two individuals - are they BNP plants?
Let us assume for a moment that your propaganda is right in the BNP - Perhaps you could explain why there is a problem, in your small minded claim, that there are 2 'ASYLUM SEEKERS' in the picture?
You are not claiming they are 'ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS', where there might be a problem - I know nothing of the circumstances of these 2 individuals and it would seem the BNP has fabricated a scenario and then managed to get it wrong!!
So very BNP - it astonishes me that UKIP and The BNP do not amalgamate their methods and messages are sadly so similar.
The fractional distortions to misrepresent and lie about things that are so common with people like Douglas Denny, Skeptyk, Mark Croucher, Annabell Fuller, Gawain Towler and the rest of the parasites feeding around the leadership of UKIP - so very common to the practices of the BNP.
I do not believe that there is EVER a morally acceptable contingency where a vote for The BNP is acceptable.
A vote for The BNP may well be the lesser of two evils but I consider it a vote for evil on any occasion.
NEVER FORGET that The BNP has failed/refused to repudiate its association with White Supremacist Extremists and the murder of some 4-5,000 mostly young men BECAUSE they were coloured - including an elected Black Mayor January 2008 & a Mexican American 2009. Similarly they have failed to renounce their past association with extreme anti Judaism.
To VOTE BNP is to Vote for Evil.