#BNP024* - TheBNP SEEMS TO HABITUALLY GET IT WRONG - DISHONESTLY DISTORTING!

#BNP024* - TheBNP SEEMS TO HABITUALLY GET IT WRONG - DISHONESTLY DISTORTING!
Hi,

I wonder if someone could explain in simple language to the BNP that this post made on their official support site 'Green Arrow' serves them ill and shows them yet again for the duplicitous and underhand people they are.

Ot is well known that I have little but contempt for UKIP under its present proven corrupt leadership and the hige diservice done to the genuine opponents of EIropean Union membership done by both wings of racism be that the BNP or UKIP under its present leadership team with its present fellow travellers in the BNP.

However this posting:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Asylum seekers campaigning for UKIP!

BNP News

UKIP’s “Anti-Islamification” and “Anti-Immigration” Posturing Exposed as Hoax

The fake UKIP party’s posturing as an anti-Islamification and anti-immigration party has been exposed as a hoax with the news that two out of the five-man strong party election team in Wrexham appear to be Muslim Somali ‘asylum seekers’ who arrived in Britain about four months ago.

 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Truely dishonest as where is there a statement regarding "Anti-Islamification" in UKIP official literature and where do they state they are "Anti-Immigration"?

I believe you will find NO WHERE.

I am happy to concede that being a party with many elderly members and supporters they have made political capital out of the move to whip up publicity based on a fear of women wearing Burqas! A particularly distasteful and ill considered piece of Zionist inspired racist stupidity, in my opinion.

The fake UKIP party’s posturing

I don't think you will find that UKIP is fake - though many of its claims and deceits may well be!

as an anti-Islamification and anti-immigration party has been exposed as a hoax

I believe this is BNP spin as I know of no approved UKIP literature that gives credence to this BNP claim!

with the news that two out of the five-man strong party election team in Wrexham appear to be Muslim Somali ‘asylum seekers’

Would that be the two at the right or the two at the left? In passing how are you able to identify their nationality from a photo, since you have led no clear evidence?

who arrived in Britain about four months ago.

It would seem that The BNP have much insight into these two individuals - are they BNP plants?

Let us assume for a moment that your propaganda is right in the BNP - Perhaps you could explain why there is a problem, in your small minded claim, that there are 2 'ASYLUM SEEKERS' in the picture?

You are not claiming they are 'ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS', where there might be a problem - I know nothing of the circumstances of these 2 individuals and it would seem the BNP has fabricated a scenario and then managed to get it wrong!!

So very BNP - it astonishes me that UKIP and The BNP do not amalgamate their methods and messages are sadly so similar.

The fractional distortions to misrepresent and lie about things that are so common with people like Douglas Denny, Skeptyk, Mark Croucher, Annabell Fuller, Gawain Towler and the rest of the parasites feeding around the leadership of UKIP - so very common to the practices of the BNP.

I do not believe that there is EVER a morally acceptable contingency where a vote for The BNP is acceptable.
A vote for The BNP may well be the lesser of two evils but I consider it a vote for evil on any occasion.
NEVER FORGET that The BNP has failed/refused to repudiate its association with White Supremacist Extremists and the murder of some 4-5,000 mostly young men BECAUSE they were coloured - including an elected Black Mayor January 2008 & a Mexican American 2009. Similarly they have failed to renounce their past association with extreme anti Judaism.
To VOTE BNP is to Vote for Evil.

BNP023 - BNP DEATH THREATS IN KITCHEN COUP ATTEMPT

BNP023 - BNP DEATH THREATS IN KITCHEN COUP ATTEMPT

BNP official Mark Collett questioned over alleged threat to kill Nick Griffin

Police arrest publicity director accused by BNP leadership of plotting 'palace coup'

• Adam Gabbatt and Matthew Taylor
• guardian.co.uk, Sunday 4 April 2010 13.52 BST

Nick Griffin and Mark Collett after winning a court case in 2006. Photograph: Christopher Furlong/Getty Images

The BNP has been thrown into turmoil weeks ahead of the general election after a senior party member was arrested for allegedly threatening to kill Nick Griffin.

Key party officials have been summoned to a meeting tomorrow to discuss "urgent organisational matters" after Griffin and colleagues made statements to police resulting in the BNP's publicity director, Mark Collett, being detained on Thursday.

Collett, 29, had been due to contest Labour MP David Blunkett's Sheffield Brightside seat in the election but has been stripped of his position within the party which accused him of conspiring to launch a "palace coup" against Griffin.

The BNP alerted members to the crisis on Wednesday. In a message to party organisers, the party said its internal security team had been investigating "alleged financial irregularities" relating to leaflets and publications, the "leaking on to the internet of sensitive party information" and "feeding lies to certain anti-BNP blog sites" for several months.

"As a result of this investigation, a very serious matter has been uncovered," the memo said. "Earlier this week, the police were made aware of very serious allegations potentially affecting the personal safety of party chairman Nick Griffin MEP and senior management/fundraising consultant James Dowson. Formal statements have now been made to the police, including by Mr Griffin."

The message said it had been necessary to act immediately "to ensure the safety of those at risk".

The timing of the row is a further blow to the BNP as it looks to build on success in last year's European elections by winning its first seat in the House of Commons. Last month the party's membership policy was ruled to be discriminatory, despite the BNP having removed a whites-only clause in February.

The BNP said it was unable to provide further details of the alleged threat to Griffin – who is standing against Labour's Margaret Hodge in Barking and Dagenham – and Dowson for fear of prejudicing legal proceedings.

The memo continued: "Since political, as opposed to allegedly criminal, conspiracies are not illegal, we are able to say that Mark Collett was conspiring with a small clique of other party officials to launch a 'palace coup' against our twice democratically elected party leader, Nick Griffin, and that in order to create the artificial climate of disillusionment necessary for this to stand any chance of success, lies and unfounded rumours have been spread, and were planned to be spread much further."
Officers asked Collett to attend a Humberside police station last week. A spokeswoman said: "A 29-year-old man was arrested on Thursday on suspicion of making threats to kill. He was interviewed by detectives at Humberside police and he has been released on bail pending further inquiries. The investigation was initiated as a result of a complaint by the member of the BNP."

BNP regional organisers and key officials have been asked to attend an "urgent briefing meeting" tomorrow to discuss the events of the last few days and the party's future plans.

A spokesman for the anti-fascist organisation Searchlight said rows over finance, particularly Griffin's European expenses, had led to the conflict. Griffin and Andrew Brons were elected to European parliament in June 2009 but have been criticised in recent weeks for failing to publish details of their spending.

"Nick Griffin is constantly claiming he is the leader of a moderate, non-violent organisation," the Searchlight spokesman said.

"It is difficult to see how he can square that assertion with his statement to the police that his own head of publicity has been plotting to kill him."

The Guardian attempted to contact senior figures within the British National party, but none were available for comment.

I do not believe that there is EVER a morally acceptable contingency where a vote for The BNP is acceptable.

A vote for The BNP may well be the lesser of two evils but I consider it a vote for evil on any occasion.

NEVER FORGET that The BNP has failed/refused to repudiate its association with White Supremacist Extremists and the murder of some 4-5,000 mostly young men BECAUSE they are coloured - including an elected Black Mayor January 2008 & a Mexican American 2009. Similarly they have failed to renounce their past association with extreme anti Judaism.
To VOTE BNP is to Vote for Evil.